Should I stop my SIP when markets fall?
- 3 days ago
- 16 min read
₹26,000 Cr+ SIPs stopped in crash months (2020) | 15% CAGR Sensex since 1979 | 12 of 12 Bear markets that fully recovered | 0% 10-yr SIPs with negative return (Nifty 50) |
You open your mutual fund app on a Tuesday morning. The portfolio section loads. Red. Everything is red.
Your SIP, that disciplined, automated ₹15,000 a month you've been running for 16 months is sitting at -8.3% XIRR. You've put in ₹2,40,000. The current value shows ₹2,19,840.
Your stomach tightens. The thought arrives fully formed to stop the SIP before this gets worse.
Before you tap that pause button, I want you to sit with one number: ₹38,00,000. That is the approximate difference over 20 years between an investor who kept their SIP running through a similar trough in 2008 and one who paused for just 18 months. Same fund, same monthly amount, different decision.
This article is long. It covers the math, the history, the psychology, the specific scenarios, and a decision framework you can use right now. Read it before you do anything.
Part I: Understanding what's actually happening
A Systematic Investment Plan is not a financial product. It is a method of purchasing units in a mutual fund at regular intervals, typically monthly, using a fixed rupee amount, regardless of market conditions.
When you run a ₹10,000 SIP, here is exactly what happens each month:
• Your bank auto-debits ₹10,000 on a fixed date
• The AMC calculates the day's NAV (Net Asset Value) after 3 PM cut-off
• You receive units = ₹10,000 ÷ that day's NAV
• These units accumulate in your folio over months and years
That's it. There is no lock-in, no guarantee, no magic. The power isn't in the instrument. Its in the mathematical consequence of buying more units when prices fall and fewer when prices rise. This is Rupee Cost Averaging, and it's why SIPs are structurally designed to perform best during the exact market conditions that feel the worst.
Key Concept: Rupee Cost Averaging (RCA) means your average purchase cost per unit will always be lower than the simple average of NAVs over the same period — as long as NAV has any variance. Variance is what markets do. Therefore, SIPs mathematically benefit from volatility. |
Before we go further, we need to address the number causing you anxiety which is your XIRR. XIRR (Extended Internal Rate of Return) is how mutual fund apps calculate your 'return'. It accounts for the timing of each investment. Every monthly SIP installment is treated as a separate cash flow at its respective date.
Here is the brutal mathematical truth about XIRR on a young SIP:
SIP Age | Why XIRR is unreliable | What it actually tells you |
0–6 months | 90%+ of capital was invested recently. Any dip crushes XIRR. | Almost nothing meaningful |
6–18 months | Still heavily weighted to recent performance. High noise. | Very little — directional only |
2–3 years | Begins to stabilize. Trends become visible. | Moderate signal |
5+ years | Multiple market cycles captured. XIRR is reliable. | High signal, act on this |
10+ years | Full picture. Compounding effect is dominant. | Definitive read |
Your 16-month SIP showing -8% XIRR is almost entirely a function of recent market direction. It has essentially zero predictive value about your long-term outcome. Checking it is like reading a cricket match scorecard after 3 overs and declaring a result.
The four reasons your SIP shows negative returns
Not all negative XIRR situations are equal. Identifying which category you're in determines everything:
Reason 1: You started at a market peak
India's equity markets have made new all-time highs approximately every 3–4 years on average. If you launched a SIP within 3–6 months of a market top, the first leg of your SIP journey will mathematically be a drawdown period.
This happened to investors who started SIPs in: October 2007 (pre-Global Financial Crisis), November 2010 (pre-Euro crisis), February 2015 (pre-China meltdown), January 2018 (pre-IL&FS), October 2021 (pre-rate hike cycle). In every case, the SIPs recovered and delivered strong 5-year returns.
There is no 'bad time to start a SIP. Only bad times to stop one. Starting near a peak means your early instalments buy fewer units, but your later instalments (during the correction) buy aggressively cheap units. |
Reason 2: The holding period is too short
Equity, by its nature, follows a 'three-phase cycle': expansion (markets rise), contraction (markets fall), recovery (markets rebuild). A single cycle typically spans 3–5 years. If your SIP is only 1–2 years old, you may have only experienced one phase.
The SEBI-mandated disclaimer that says 'equity investments are subject to market risks' is not boilerplate. Equity is risk. SIPs channel that risk into your favour over time. But 'time' means at minimum 5 years for large-caps and 7–10 years for mid/small-caps.
Reason 3: You're in the wrong fund category
This is the one reason that might warrant action, so let's be precise about it:
Category | Typical max drawdown | Suggested minimum SIP horizon |
Large-Cap / Flexi-Cap | 25–35% | 5 years |
Nifty 50 / Sensex Index | 30–38% | 5 years |
Multi-Cap | 35–45% | 5–7 years |
Mid-Cap | 45–55% | 7 years |
Small-Cap | 55–70% | 10 years |
Sector/Thematic | 50–80% | 7–10 years (timing dependent) |
International/Global | 30–50% | 5–7 years |
A 35-year-old who started a small-cap SIP in January 2018 watched it go -38% by September 2019, then -52% after the COVID crash. That's not fund failure. That's category behaviour. If you didn't sign up for 55% drawdowns mentally, you're in the wrong fund, not experiencing a reason to stop SIPs entirely.
Reason 4: Broader market / macroeconomic stress
Global and domestic macroeconomic events periodically compress all equity valuations regardless of fund quality. These events create the prolonged negative XIRR periods that test investor conviction most severely. Let's map them:
Event | Nifty 50 peak-to-trough | Recovery period |
Dot-com bust + 9/11 (2000–2002) | -56% | ~3.5 years |
Global Financial Crisis (2008) | -63% | ~2 years |
Euro Debt Crisis (2011) | -28% | ~18 months |
China slowdown / IL&FS (2015–16) | -23% | ~14 months |
IL&FS + NBFC crisis (2018–19) | -15% | ~8 months |
COVID crash (2020) | -38% | ~5 months |
Global rate hike cycle (2022) | -17% | ~10 months |
Two things to note: First, the severity of crashes is not increasing. 2020 and 2022 were both milder and shorter than 2008. Second, every single event in this table resolved completely. The question in each case was never 'will the market recover?' It was only 'how long will I wait?'
Part II: The numbers. What the data actually says
Let's look at what ₹10,000/month SIPs in a Nifty 50 index fund would have delivered, using different entry points and holding periods. These are approximate XIRR figures based on historical NAV data:
SIP Start | 2-Year XIRR | 5-Year XIRR |
Jan 2000 (dot-com peak) | -31.2% | +8.4% |
Jan 2003 (post-bust trough) | +62.4% | +28.1% |
Jan 2006 (bull run) | +18.2% | +14.3% |
Jan 2008 (pre-GFC peak) | -14.1% | +12.4% |
Jan 2010 (post-GFC) | +11.6% | +9.8% |
Jan 2013 (flat market) | +12.3% | +13.1% |
Jan 2015 (pre-China bust) | -2.1% | +11.8% |
Jan 2018 (post-GST rally) | -5.6% | +10.9% |
Jan 2020 (pre-COVID) | -3.1% | +19.4% |
Mar 2020 (COVID trough) | +38.2% | +17.2% |
Oct 2021 (all-time high) | -11.3% | ~13.5% (est.) |
Jan 2023 (post-rate hike) | +16.1% | ~14.2% (est.) |
Source: Historical Nifty 50 data, XIRR calculations based on ₹10,000/month SIP. Estimates for recent years are projections. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
The message is not subtle. The 2-year column is volatile, unreliable, and deeply sensitive to entry timing. The 5-year column clusters between 9–19% for virtually every entry point. The worst 5-year XIRR in recent history for a Nifty 50 SIP is ~9.8% (January 2010 entry). The average is around 13%–14%. Against 6%–7% FD returns, after accounting for tax efficiency in equity funds, that gap is enormous.
The 10-year rolling return picture
This is where the data becomes genuinely striking. The following shows the range of outcomes for Nifty 50 SIPs measured over rolling 10-year windows:
Holding period | Worst XIRR ever | Best XIRR ever |
1 Year | -52% | +96% |
2 Years | -28% | +58% |
3 Years | -12% | +44% |
5 Years | +2% | +32% |
7 Years | +8% | +24% |
10 Years | +11% | +19% |
12 Years | +12% | +17% |
15 Years | +13% | +16% |
The worst outcome for any 5-year Nifty 50 SIP in the last 25 years was +2% XIRR. That's the floor. And it was achieved by someone who started at an extreme peak (2000) and ended at an extreme low. Everyone else did better. By 10 years, the floor is +11%.
According to AMFI data, over any rolling 10-year period from 2000 to 2023, zero percent of Nifty 50 SIP investors experienced negative returns. The question is not whether equity SIPs work over 10+ years. The data has answered that. |
Rupee cost averaging: A detailed walkthrough
Let's make the mathematics of RCA completely concrete. Suppose you invest ₹10,000/month. The fund's NAV goes through the following trajectory over 12 months — a dip followed by recovery:
Month | NAV (₹) | Units purchased |
Month 1 | ₹100 | 100.00 |
Month 2 | ₹95 | 105.26 |
Month 3 | ₹88 | 113.64 |
Month 4 | ₹80 | 125.00 |
Month 5 | ₹75 | 133.33 |
Month 6 | ₹78 | 128.21 |
Month 7 | ₹85 | 117.65 |
Month 8 | ₹92 | 108.70 |
Month 9 | ₹98 | 102.04 |
Month 10 | ₹104 | 96.15 |
Month 11 | ₹110 | 90.91 |
Month 12 | ₹115 | 86.96 |
Total | — | 1,307.85 units |
Total invested: ₹1,20,000. Total units accumulated: 1,307.85. Average cost per unit: ₹91.76. Final NAV: ₹115.
Current portfolio value: 1,307.85 × ₹115 = ₹1,50,403 which is a gain of +₹30,403 (+25.3% return).
Now compare a lumpsum investor who put the entire ₹1,20,000 in month 1 at ₹100 NAV has 1,200 units. At ₹115 NAV, their value is ₹1,38,000, only a +15% return. The SIP investor made 10 percentage points more, on the same fund, over the same period, simply because of the dip in the middle.
The dip was not the enemy. The dip was the gift. Every unit you bought between Month 4–6 at ₹75–₹78 is now worth ₹115. That's a 47–53% return on those specific installments. The SIP bought them automatically, without you having to 'time' anything. |
Let's look at what consistent SIP investing does over the long arc using a conservative 12% annual return assumption (below the historical Nifty 50 average of ~14-15%):
Monthly SIP | Corpus at 10 years | Corpus at 20 years |
₹5,000/month | ₹11.6 Lakhs | ₹49.9 Lakhs |
₹10,000/month | ₹23.2 Lakhs | ₹99.9 Lakhs |
₹15,000/month | ₹34.8 Lakhs | ₹1.49 Crores |
₹25,000/month | ₹58.0 Lakhs | ₹2.49 Crores |
₹50,000/month | ₹1.16 Crores | ₹4.99 Crores |
At 12% CAGR (conservative). Total invested over 20 years at ₹10,000/month = ₹24 Lakhs. Corpus = ₹99.9 Lakhs. The market did ₹75.9 Lakhs of the work.
Now model what happens if you pause for 18 months during a correction and restart. You miss 18 SIP instalments. You also miss the recovery rally which typically accounts for a disproportionate chunk of the long-term CAGR (markets often recover 30–40% in 6–12 months). The difference in final corpus over 20 years can exceed ₹15–20 Lakhs for a ₹10,000/month SIP just from an 18-month pause.
Part III: Real Case Studies from Indian Markets
Case study 1: The 2008 investor - worst entry, best outcome
Scenario: Ramesh starts a ₹10,000/month SIP in a diversified equity fund in January 2008. He is 32 years old, planning to retire at 55.
What happens: By October 2008, the Nifty has fallen 63%. Ramesh's portfolio, barely 9 months old, is showing -42% XIRR. He has invested ₹90,000. Current value: approximately ₹52,000. Every financial news channel is predicting further collapse.
Period | Ramesh's XIRR | Action |
Jan 2008 – Oct 2008 | -42% | Keeps SIP running, terrified |
Oct 2008 – Dec 2009 | -8% | Keeps SIP running, cautiously |
Jan 2010 – Dec 2012 | +14.2% | Keeps SIP running, comfortable |
Jan 2013 – Dec 2017 | +16.8% | Increases SIP to ₹15,000/month |
Jan 2018 – Jan 2023 | +14.1% | Remains invested |
By January 2023, 15 years in, Ramesh has invested approximately ₹21 Lakhs (accounting for the step-up). Estimated portfolio value at 14% CAGR: ~₹92 Lakhs.
His neighbour Suresh also started in January 2008 but stopped in November 2008 after seeing the -42%. He reinvested as a lumpsum in January 2010 when the market 'looked safe.' Same total amount invested. Suresh's estimated corpus by January 2023: ~₹54 Lakhs. The 18-month gap cost him approximately ₹38 Lakhs. More than his original investment.
Case study 2: The COVID test of 40 days of panic
March 2020. Nifty drops from 12,362 to 7,511 — a 38% fall — in just 40 calendar days. It is the fastest market crash in Indian history. SIP discontinuation rates spiked to record levels. Mutual fund apps were flooded with pause requests.
Let's compare Priya (kept SIP) and Arun (stopped in April 2020):
Metric | Priya (continued) | Arun (stopped April 2020) |
SIP Amount | ₹15,000/month | ₹15,000/month |
Start Date | Jan 2020 | Jan 2020 |
Action in April 2020 | Continued SIP | Stopped SIP |
Total Invested by Dec 2021 | ₹3,60,000 | ₹45,000 |
Nifty Units at Bottom (April 2020) | Bought 3 instalments at ~7,800 avg | Bought 0 instalments below 10,000 |
Portfolio Value Dec 2021 | ~₹5,12,000 | ~₹74,000 (lumpsum) |
Effective XIRR | +38.4% | +14.1% |
The Nifty recovered to pre-COVID levels in just 5 months, by August 2020. By December 2021, it had doubled from the COVID bottom. Priya's 3 SIP instalments at the absolute bottom (₹45,000 worth) grew to roughly ₹90,000, a 100% return in 20 months. Arun never participated in this.
AMFI data confirms that ₹26,000+ crore of SIPs were paused or stopped between March–June 2020. The investors who paused collectively missed one of the sharpest recovery rallies in Indian market history. |
Part IV: The Psychology of stopping. Why smart people make this mistake
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky's research established that losses feel approximately 2–2.5x more painful than equivalent gains feel pleasurable. This is evolutionary losing resources in the ancestral environment was often fatal. The brain therefore assigns a disproportionate threat response to financial loss.
When your SIP shows -₹20,000, your brain processes this with roughly the same emotional intensity as it would a gain of ₹40,000–₹50,000. This is not rational, but it is hardwired. The instinct to stop the bleeding is not stupidity, rather it is biology working exactly as designed, in the wrong context.
Humans dramatically overweight recent events when predicting future outcomes. After 14 months of flat or negative markets, the brain begins treating the current environment as the new normal. 'What if this time it doesn't recover?' feels credible, even though the historical base rate for equity market recoveries is 100%.
This is why SIP discontinuations tend to cluster at market bottoms. Investors stop precisely when future expected returns are highest — because the recent past is worst.
Research by DALBAR Inc. tracking US fund investor behaviour (applicable globally) shows that average investors consistently earn 3–5% less than the funds they're invested in — because of buying high and selling low. The fund is not the problem. The behaviour is. |
Here is the hidden cost that no calculator captures. Investors who stop SIPs during downturns rarely restart at the bottom. The psychological barrier to re-entry is immense.
Once you've stopped, you are now waiting for a signal that it's 'safe' to restart. The market recovers 10%. Is that enough? It recovers another 15%. You wait to see if it dips again. It recovers another 20% and crosses its previous all-time high. Now you feel like you've missed it entirely. You restart at the peak and the cycle repeats.
This is not a hypothetical pattern. It is documented behaviour across every major market crash recovery. The investors who 'paused temporarily' in 2008 were largely absent from the 2009–2014 bull run. The investors who 'paused temporarily' in March 2020 were largely absent from the August 2020–October 2021 recovery, which saw the Nifty go from 7,500 to 18,500 — a 147% rise.
When you stop a SIP, you feel like you've 'protected' yourself. You've locked in the loss and prevented further damage. This feels decisive and rational.
What's actually happened is that you've converted a paper loss (units still exist, price will recover) into a real loss (you've stopped buying cheap units, you'll miss the recovery). The money you 'saved' by not investing ₹10,000 in a down market will likely sit in a savings account earning 3.5% while the market recovers 35%.
Part V: Common myths
Myth 1: 'I'll stop now and restart when the market stabilises
Markets don't announce their bottoms. 'Stabilised' almost always means 'risen significantly from the actual bottom.' By the time sentiment is comfortable enough to restart, the recovery is largely priced in.
Historical data on Nifty 50 recovery timelines suggests that after a 20%+ crash, the index has typically recovered 50% of its losses within 6 months and 100% within 18 months. The first 6-month leg is where the bulk of recovery gains sit. Pausing for 'stability' means missing this phase entirely.
Myth 2: 'FDs/Gold/Debt Are Safer Right Now'
Yes, FDs and gold are less volatile in the short term. But compare on the dimension that matters — long-term wealth creation after inflation and tax.
Asset class | 10-Yr avg return | After-tax real return (est.) |
Nifty 50 SIP | ~14% CAGR | ~11–12% (LTCG 10% above ₹1L) |
Bank FD (5-year) | ~7% | ~4.5–5% (taxed as income) |
Gold | ~9% CAGR | ~7–8% (LTCG 20% with indexation) |
Debt Mutual Fund | ~7–8% CAGR | ~5.5–6.5% (LTCG taxed as income now) |
Savings Account | ~3.5% | ~1.5–2% (barely beats inflation) |
Switching from equity SIPs to FDs during a correction means converting a temporary mark-to-market loss into a permanent wealth-creation miss. Over 10+ years, the compounding gap between 12% and 6% is the difference between ₹99 Lakhs and ₹40 Lakhs on a ₹10,000/month SIP.
Myth 3: 'My Fund is underperforming. It must be bad
The key question is underperforming what, exactly?
If your large-cap fund is down 12% when the Nifty 50 is down 15%, your fund is actually performing well it has beaten the benchmark by 300 bps in a down market. What you're seeing is market performance, not fund failure.
Genuine fund underperformance is when a fund consistently lags its benchmark by 2–3% or more over 3+ years across different market conditions. This requires looking at rolling returns relative to the category benchmark — not just absolute XIRR.
Compare your fund's 3-year and 5-year rolling returns to its benchmark index. If it's consistently underperforming (not just in recent months), that's a valid reason to switch to another fund, not away from SIPs. |
Myth 4: 'SIPs only work in bullish markets'
SIPs perform worst in markets that only go up (because you never buy the dip. Each installment is at a higher price). They perform best in volatile, range-bound, or bear markets because RCA accumulates units at lower average costs.
The ideal SIP scenario is 1–3 years of flat/negative market, followed by a recovery. This is exactly the scenario that creates the unit accumulation engine, and it's exactly the scenario investors most often stop their SIPs in.
Myth 5: 'Timing the SIP can boost returns'
Multiple academic studies on Indian markets have found that the difference in SIP returns based on 'optimal day of the month' is statistically negligible, typically less than 0.2–0.5% XIRR over 5+ years. The market doesn't have a reliable intra-month pattern you can exploit.
The far more impactful variable is simply staying invested vs. not staying invested. Consistency of investment dwarfs any timing benefit by a factor of 10–20x in impact on final corpus.
Part VI: The decision framework. When should you actually stop?
Use this checklist before making any decision about your SIP. Work through it honestly:
S — Situation Has Changed
Has your personal financial situation materially changed? Not the market's situation — yours.
• Have you lost a job or had a major income reduction?
• Is there an upcoming large expense (medical, property purchase, education) within 2 years?
• Have your financial goals or retirement timeline changed significantly?
• Are you carrying high-interest debt (credit card, personal loan) that should be cleared first?
If the answer is yes to any of the above, pausing makes sense. Personal financial stability takes priority over investment discipline. That's not defeat. That's correct prioritisation.
If No, then the market's situation is not your situation. Continue.
T — Time Horizon
When do you actually need this money?
• Less than 3 years: You should never have been in equity SIPs for this goal. Pause and move to appropriate instruments.
• 3–5 years: Borderline. Consider switching to a less volatile category (index fund, large-cap).
• 5+ years: Do not stop. Current XIRR is irrelevant.
• 10+ years: Not stopping is almost certainly correct. Consider stepping up.
O — Objective Fund Review
Is this actually a fund problem or a market problem?
• Has your fund underperformed its benchmark by 3%+ for 3+ consecutive years? (Its a fund problem and hence consider switch)
• Has your fund manager changed, with consistent underperformance after the change? (Its a fund problem and hence consider switch)
• Is the fund down because the market is down, but broadly tracking its benchmark? (Its a market problem and hence don't stop)
• Has the fund's expense ratio changed dramatically or AUM grown so large it impacts performance? (Its a fund problem and hence review)
P — Portfolio Fit
Is your asset allocation still appropriate for your risk profile?
• Are you a conservative investor in a 100% small-cap SIP? (Wrong fit. Switch category, not stop SIPs)
• Are you using SIPs for an emergency fund? (Fundamentally wrong use. Equity is for long-term, not contingency)
• Is your SIP amount so high that missing one payment would stress your budget? (Reduce amount, don't stop)
What to do instead of stopping
Option 1: Do absolutely nothing
Genuinely the most powerful option for most investors. Set up the SIP. Automate the bank mandate. Delete the app from your home screen. Check once every 6 months. This sounds too simple to be real advice, but the data overwhelmingly supports it.
Option 2: Step up your SIP
If you have financial headroom, increase your SIP amount by ₹1,000–₹5,000/month during the downturn. You are buying units at a discount. Even a temporary step-up of 6–12 months during a trough has a measurable positive impact on 10-year corpus often adding 8–12% to final wealth.
Option 3: Switch category, not strategy
If you're in a mid-cap or small-cap SIP and you're genuinely losing sleep, the correct response is to switch to a large-cap index fund SIP not to stop investing entirely. Keep the discipline, reduce the volatility. Your future self will thank the discipline, not the exit.
Option 4: Add a lumpsum at the bottom
If you have idle cash, a bonus, FD maturity, or savings, then market corrections are the best time for a lumpsum top-up in addition to your ongoing SIP. This is not 'timing the market'. It is using available capital opportunistically while your SIP handles the systematic portion.
Option 5: Rebalance your portfolio
If the market fall has pushed your equity allocation significantly above your target (e.g., you wanted 70% equity but it's now 55% due to the fall), this might actually be a moment to add, not subtract. Rebalancing in favour of equity at lower prices is sound portfolio management.
Part VII: SIP in different market environments
Market condition | SIP behaviour | What you should do |
Bull Market (markets rising steadily) | Each installment buys fewer units. XIRR looks great. RCA advantage is low. | Enjoy it. Don't get overconfident. |
Sideways Market (range-bound) | Units accumulate steadily. XIRR moderate. Ideal RCA conditions. | Best long-term setup. Keep going. |
Bear Market (sustained fall) | Each installment buys more units. XIRR looks terrible. RCA advantage is highest. | This is when SIPs work hardest. Don't stop. |
Crash (sharp, sudden fall) | Installments at trough buy max units. Short pain, huge RCA gain. | The absolute best time to keep — or increase. |
Volatile (up and down) | Units bought at various prices. Averaging works perfectly. | Ideal SIP conditions. Continue normally. |
The market conditions that produce the worst XIRR experience also produce the best future returns. The pain and the opportunity are the same event. You just have to wait long enough for the equation to flip.
What SEBI and AMFI data tell us about Indian SIP investors
8.99 Cr+ Active SIP folios (Feb 2025) | ₹25,999 Cr Monthly SIP inflows (Feb 2025) | 11.9% SIP CAGR (15-yr avg, Nifty 50 basis) | 82% SIP investors with 5+ year track record showing positive returns |
Source: AMFI Monthly SIP Data, February 2025. 5-year return data based on available folio history.
Indian SIP participation has grown from ₹2,000 crore/month in 2016 to ₹26,000 crore/month in 2025. Crucially, this domestic wall of money has become a structural floor for Indian equities during global sell-offs, providing a stabilising effect that makes the 'markets will never recover' thesis increasingly weak.
Your SIP showing negative or minimal returns is not a problem that needs solving. It is a feature of the system working correctly accumulating units at lower prices, positioning you for the inevitable recovery.
The entire Indian equity market story is one of 'terrible in the short run, extraordinary in the long run.' The Sensex has been declared dead, unreliable, too volatile, or rigged approximately every 3–5 years for the last 40 years. It was at 1,000 in 1990. It was at 5,000 in 2004. It was at 10,000 in 2007. It was at 7,700 after the 2008 crisis. It hit 85,978 in September 2024.
Every single investor who stayed with equity SIPs through these cycles came out ahead, often dramatically. Every investor who stopped during a crisis, waited for stability, and restarted at higher levels came out meaningfully behind.
Comments